Understanding the challenges of obtaining high-titre materials

High-titre biological materials play a vital role in the development and manufacturing of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) controls and calibrators. These materials are essential for accurate and reliable diagnostic tests – a crucial part of patient care and treatment decision-making. However, sourcing bulk high-titre disease state materials presents significant challenges for Quality Control and Calibrator Manufacturers. These obstacles impact downstream processes for IVD companies, and more importantly, the patients who awaiting testing, diagnosis, and treatment.

 

To better understand the challenges, their impact, and potential solutions, we spoke to Brian Fernandez, Biotech Consultant-IVD Specialist, and Andrew Conner, Procurement Director at Logical Biological. Read on to explore their perspectives and practical solutions for those working in the IVD procurement and supply chain sector.

 

Why are high-titre materials becoming harder to source?

In R&D, you need everything from negatives to high positives to validate an assay. But in manufacturing, the goal is reliability: a consistent, secure supply chain to meet mid-term needs.” Andrew told us. This contrast underscores the sourcing challenges bulk manufacturers face in a regulatory and operational landscape that demands consistency over variation.

 

However, several factors are making sourcing high-titre biological materials more challenging to collect:

  • Advances in treatment reduce availability: Improved medical treatment has created a paradox for the IVD industry. While these improvements benefit patients, they also diminish the presence of key biomarkers in the population. For example, rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies linked to infections like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus are suppressed in many treated individuals, making high-titre samples harder to find.
  • Short-lived antibodies narrow the collection window: Antibodies such as immunoglobulin M (IgM), crucial for detecting early-stage infections, appear transiently and typically decline after seroconversion to immunoglobulin G (IgG). As Andrew explained: “By the time someone seeks care, the IgM window may have already passed. That makes pinpointing this phase more opportunistic and uncertain.
  • Geographical and ethical constraints: Some disease-state materials, like HIV-2, are predominantly found in specific regions such as West Africa. This geographic limitation, coupled with the need for ethical, consent-based sourcing, narrows the available pool. Many countries restrict or prohibit compensated donation, but this adds another layer of complexity for global procurement. As Andrew mentioned, “You need that outreach to find active infections at different levels, and that often means looking beyond Europe and North America. However, it has to be regulated, consented, and equitable, especially when vulnerable populations are involved.
  • A quality-first manufacturing culture: Manufacturers often exercise caution when switching suppliers or materials, especially under stringent regulatory frameworks. Minor adjustments like blending or spiking to meet titre levels can trigger validation requirements, which increase both time and cost.

 

Bench to bedside: The impact on Control and Calibrator Manufacturers, HCPs, and patients

The scarcity of high-titre materials directly affects Control and Calibrator Manufacturers, healthcare providers (HCPs), and ultimately, patients.

 

Production delays and rising costs: Scarcity of high-titre materials leads to smaller batch sizes, escalating costs per unit and complicating planning cycles.

 

Brian Fernandez, an experienced professional in the control and calibrator space, shared the challenges he faced first-hand:

I recall running into difficulties sourcing disease state plasma for RF, antistreptolysin O and total immunoglobulin E quite frequently. The result is that we would adjust our bulk sizes down to accommodate, which could have supply issues with our finished products. In the worst-case scenario, even with drastic volume reductions, we couldn’t reach our intended high-level target. That not only put us at risk of releasing a non-conforming finished good, but also meant that end users lacked quality control materials capable of truly challenging the upper dynamic range of their assays.

 

This real-world example illustrates the delicate balance procurement teams must maintain between availability, quality, and regulatory compliance.

 

Quality assurance and regulatory hurdles: Regulators often mandate that controls represent native patient samples. Shifting to synthetic materials is a long-term consideration, but not always viable in the short term. “Everyone knows these native materials are getting harder to source. The real question is: when do we move toward synthetic — and are we ready to validate that shift?”, added Andrew. Subsequently, manufacturers may find themselves forced into suboptimal interim solutions.

 

Patient impact: Disruptions in quality control can result in delayed or inaccurate diagnoses, affecting patient care. For clinicians, this means uncertainty, while for patients, it can mean delays to treatment.

 

The Logical Biological difference

At Logical Biological, we are committed to being a trusted partner in sourcing sustainable, high-quality biological raw materials for control and calibrator manufacturing.

Global outreach

Our extensive and growing network currently spans 45 clinical collection sites across five continents, providing access ethically to a diverse range of materials. As Andrew noted, “Certain infections appear only in specific regions. Without a global network, you’re cut off from that biology, full stop.

Quality assured

We prioritise a rigorous onboarding process for new collection centres, including regulatory vetting, quality assessments, and donor consent protocols.

Ethically obtained

We ensure ethical material collection practices by ensuring all collection centres have the necessary documentation.

Secure supply chain

Our logistics partners maintain high standards, using temperature-controlled shipping methods to preserve sample integrity during transportation and ensure high-titre materials remain free from bioburden.

Meeting evolving demands

Market requirements evolve rapidly, and demand can change overnight. As Andrew noted, “We track historical trends, so when we see a spike, like dengue recently, we’re not surprised we’re ready.” Our approach allows us to evaluate feasibility within 48 hours, developing comprehensive plans from 7–14 days.

Exceptional service

Through proactive planning with our clients, we offer clear communication on feasibility, logistics, and lead times. Our collaborative approach benefits every stakeholder by bringing the right expertise to bear on a customer challenge.

 

Logical Biological: A reliable, global partner in a complex market

Sourcing high-titre biological materials is a difficult but essential process. Our global network makes us a reliable partner for sourcing high-quality material. It means we can address both current and future customer demands while meeting both operational and regulatory requirements with confidence.

 

Contact us if you are facing challenges with sourcing high-titre or rare biological materials, or to discuss how we can support your business.

When it comes to manufacturing quality controls (QCs), choosing the right raw material is essential. Controls need to be accurate, reliable, consistent, and closely mimic real patient samples. But with factors like supply consistency and sustainability, cost, stability, and performance to be considered, how do you decide whether a native or synthetic biological raw material is best? This article explores the advantages, disadvantages, and provides expert insights on selecting the best approach for quality control development.

 

Understanding Native and Synthetic Raw Materials

Native Biological Raw Materials

Native raw materials are biological substances derived from humans or extracted from human-based materials such as native antigen extracts, tissues, cells, blood, serum, plasma, and other bodily fluids. These materials undergo minimal processing to preserve their functional integrity, making them highly relevant in research, therapeutic applications, and diagnostic testing.

Examples of Native Materials:

  • Defibrinated human disease state plasma processed to resemble serum.
  • Natively derived biofluids (e.g., serum, plasma) formulated with purified native analytes like proteins, enzymes, or antibodies to achieve required concentrations.

Synthetic Biological Raw Materials

Synthetic raw materials are engineered biological substances designed to mimic or enhance the functionality of native biological counterparts. They are produced using molecular biology techniques and can offer advantages in terms of stability, scalability, and purity.

Examples of Synthetic Materials:

  • Synthetic plasma or serum matrices made from buffers, polymers, or animal-derived components.
  • Recombinant proteins (e.g., antigens, enzymes, synthetic antibodies) produced via genetic engineering.
  • Modified biomolecules incorporating chemical cross-linking to achieve desired performance or enhance stability.

 

Evaluating Native vs. Synthetic Raw Materials: A Comparative Analysis

To support informed decision-making, the following provides a comparative analysis outlining the advantages and disadvantages associated with native and synthetic raw materials:

Feature Native Raw Materials Synthetic Raw Materials
Biological Relevance High, often more commutable with patient samples May differ from native samples, depending on complexity
Functionality Maybe superior for complex multimeric proteins, cofactors, and post-translational modifications May lack certain native functionalities, but can be optimised
Lot-to-Lot Consistency Natural variability due to biological differences High consistency across batches
Scalability Limited, depends on biological sourcing More easily scalable for high production volumes
Risk of Contamination Potential for human pathogens and biological contaminants Lower contamination risk, free from human pathogens
Ethical Considerations Ethical considerations when sourcing from human donors, particularly high-titre materials from patients No human donor concerns
Stability & Purity Variable stability and risk of degradation if not stored properly Generally, more stable and higher purity
Cost & Availability Can be cost-effective but may be limited by supply Expensive to develop but offers greater availability
Development Time Readily available providing access to suitable donors is sustainable Longer initial development and scale-up time

 

Expert Insights: Native Materials and Their Unique Advantages

One of the most critical factors when selecting raw materials for quality controls is ensuring that they mirror actual patient samples in their response to assay system changes. Experts note that native materials often provide better commutability, meaning they exhibit similar shifts and biases to patient samples when instrument performance, reagents, or calibrators change.

One of our industry experts shared an example where a human-derived cholesterol control detected an assay issue, while an animal-derived control failed to flag the problem. This highlights a key benefit of using native materials—ensuring that quality control samples respond to system variations in the same way as real patient samples.

However, native materials present several challenges, including biological variability, limited scalability, and potential contamination risks. Some complex proteins, such as haemoglobin tetramers and various growth factors, require precise folding, complex subunit assembly and/or post-translational processing, which can be difficult to replicate outside of the natural host organism.  While synthetic biotechnology techniques continue to improve, some proteins are still best sourced through their native sources.

 

Synthetic Materials: Achieving Consistency and Scalability

Synthetic and recombinant materials provide greater consistency and scalability, making them attractive alternatives when native materials are costly or difficult to obtain. Recombinant proteins and synthetic matrices eliminate pathogen risks and offer batch-to-batch consistency.

However, some synthetic raw materials lack key post-translational modifications (PTMs) or require complex folding that native systems inherently achieve. Certain recombinant antibodies, for instance, may not perfectly replicate the native structure due to difficulties in assembling heavy and light chains with correct disulfide bonds. Mammalian expression systems can mitigate some of these issues but add to production costs and complexity.

 

Making the Right Choice: Practical Considerations

Functionality vs. Feasibility

  • If functional integrity and biological relevance are the top priorities, native materials may be preferable.
  • If lot-to-lot consistency and large-scale production are essential, synthetic materials should be considered.

Cost and Supply Constraints

  • Native materials may be cost-effective when high-titre sources are available but can be limited in supply.
  • Synthetic materials often require high initial investment but ensure consistent availability in the long run.

Testing in Feasibility Studies

A practical approach maybe to evaluate both native and synthetic options during feasibility studies. As one industry expert advises:

“I believe there is still a perceived superiority of native materials in quality control development. However, if synthetic options provide cost or availability advantages, I will include them in my feasibility studies and assess their performance. Sometimes, synthetic options can outperform native materials in cost effectiveness, availability, and even performance!”

 

Conclusion: Striking a Balance Between Native and Synthetic

The decision between native vs. synthetic raw materials depends on a careful balance of biological relevance, scalability, and cost. While native materials often provide superior functionality and commutability, synthetic materials offer greater consistency, scalability, and reduced contamination risks.

The debate between native and synthetic raw materials will likely continue, but by understanding their strengths and limitations, QC manufacturers can make informed decisions. Whether you’re using native or synthetic biological raw materials, the right choice depends on your specific needs and the parameter being tested.

Our Managing Director James Steggles took time out at the recent AACC conference to join up with Sona Nanotech (experts in colloidal gold for Lateral Flow / Rapid Tests) to discuss human patient materials, reagents for IVD immunoassays and more! Tune in here: